:> For what it's worth, I think releasing 4.0 *without* IPv6 support
:> is a mistake.  Why ?  Because in < 12 months FreeBSD 5.0 will be
:> released *with* IPv6 support (I'd count IPv6 as being a big enough
:> change to signify a major release number change).  If that doesn't
:> happen, then FreeBSD is chasing the wrong goals, IMHO.
:
:I would like to agree with darren on this one. And think IPv6 should go
:into 4.0 even if the date needs to be pushed back. It is a major release
:and adding v6 is a major change. Thats just my 2 cents anyway.
:
:Chris

    We are not going to repeat the 3.0 mess.   IPV6 and IPSEC are important,
    but not important enough to delay the already-delayed 4.0 release.  4.1 
    is not too late for these babies.

    On the other hand, there are *plenty* of things already in 4.0 that really
    need to get out there and get a workout by a larger audience. 
    Delaying *them* is a big mistake.

                                        -Matt
                                        Matthew Dillon 
                                        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to