On Fri, 7 Jan 100, Darren Reed wrote:

> In some email I received from Steve Ames, sie wrote:
> > 
> > *shudder* I really, really dislike the idea of -RELEASE actually being a
> > wide beta so that some code can get a workout. LAbel it beta and more people
> > will use it than currently do anyway. Any reason not to release and ship a
> > 4.0-beta? -CURRENT = development which scares people. Beta means most bugs
> > already ironed out and looking for test by larger audience.  -RELEASE should
> > not be a beta, ever.
> 
> What do you think 3.0-RELEASE was ?
> This seems to be how FreeBSD works now.
> 
There really isn't an alternative.  If there were thousands of people
begging for beta code to test and we decided to just call it a release,
that would be a different story, but there aren't.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to