Quoting Navdeep Parhar <npar...@gmail.com> (from Thu, 22 Apr 2010
01:33:22 -0700):
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:44:47AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Navdeep Parhar <npar...@gmail.com> (from Wed, 21 Apr 2010
18:23:33 -0700):
>Your patch works for me, thanks. There is just one more problem
with the CTF
I found a case where it does not work (not kernel related), I have
another one which works better.
>generation that needs to be fixed:
>
>http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2009-April/028244.html
>
>While you're here can you take a look at the patch in that email too?
Looks good in concept, but the CTFMERGE line needs the same
treatment like all the other ones in the .mk files. I want to commit
a suitable change today.
Does "same treatment" mean it should run silently too? My personal
Yes.
opinion is that all ctfconvert and ctfmerge commands should show up in
the output of make iff they run. I believe that used to be the case
before r206082.
Correct, and I agree.
The problem is the inverse-logic construct for the check if it shall
be run or not which is consistent with all places where this is done.
There is no easy way to only display a part of the command which is
executed. It was decided by ... (jhb and rwatson?) to not display at
all while we still have the default to without ctf (without the @ we
will even have some display of something with ctfconvert or ctfmerge
in the name, when no ctf info is put into the files). They want to
have the default to with ctf when it is ready/stable enough. I assume
that at this point the commands get shown again, as the handling of
the with/without CTF stuff can be simplified in this case. It is not
as easy as all the other with/without stuff we have, due to the fact
that parts of the ctf stuff is in sys.mk, which is read before every
other file.
Currently I want to finish the edge cases we noticed in a *consistent*
way, to have something which is giving us stable behavior. After that
I will go out of the loop and anyone is free to try/optimize what he
wants (as long as I can get a kernel compiled with CTF info without
much hassle, I do not care much what is done and how).
HTH,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
A hermit is a deserter from the army of humanity.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
