On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:15:40PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > 6.2 and 7.0 CVS sources (which are graphed on Jeff's blog and my > > webpage linked there) are unlikely to differ much: as I said, filedesc > > locking was key to fixing performance here. I'm sure we'll be > > promoting this improvement heavily when 7.0 enters release cycle, to > > encourage people to consider upgrading. > > Sorry, I was very imprecise - I meant 6.2 vs 7-current+patches from that > benchmark.
I'm saying that the 7.0-CVS sources, which are graphed, are unlikely to differ significantly from 6.2-CVS, i.e. they do not show good scaling on this benchmark because of the problems with filedesc locking in CVS. Kris
pgpZVFCtFiXSo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
