>>>>> "Dinesh" == Dinesh Nair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dinesh> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:06:33 -0800, Peter Losher Dinesh> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ivan Voras wrote: >> >> > I agree in general, but MySQL performance is very exposed as an > >> advocacy issue - it has traditionally been the source of statements >> > like "FreeBSD's threading implementation is weak/bad/broken". >> >> And these days ISC can't consciously recommend FreeBSD for use on >> high-traffic DNS servers because UDP performance has (frankly) gone >> downhill since 5.x. [..snipped..] >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-September/011748.html Dinesh> if UDP performance in 6.x and 7.x has dropped, this could even Dinesh> affect voip applications/servers such as asterisk when run on Dinesh> FreeBSD. most all use RTP for media traffic and RTP is nearly Dinesh> always UDP generating up to 50 packets per second per call per Dinesh> direction. Dinesh> 14,000+ packets per second is only about 140 calls. Well... again, BIND is not a good indicator of UDP performance. A non-trivial application can send and receive about 250k pps on moderate hardware. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can be | |Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
