>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> On 02/28/07 03:06, Peter Losher wrote: >> Ivan Voras wrote: >> We recently put a stock Fedora Core 6 and a stock FreeBSD 6.2 on >> the same HW (HP ProLiant DL320 G5 Dual Core Xeons w/ 16GB RAM) and >> running BIND 9.4.0 and a well known ccTLD zone that we slammed a >> query stream to. On a single threaded BIND, there was a 20% >> advantage to Linux, on a multi threaded build, Linux trounced >> FreeBSD (39k to 89k queries/sec) I don't believe this is specifically a FreeBSD UDP performance issue. Using NSD as the nameserver and fast core-2 duos, FreeBSD was able to old 140k queries/sec while linux (on the same machine) ran 90k queries per second. This was using two server threads. I believe the numbers were 120k and 80k for one server thread. But: the whole reason I'm testing NSD for a client is because BIND has huge performance bottlenecks with large zones (bind reportedly takes 20 minutes from when it run to when it's ready to serve the first query). Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can be | |Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
