On 2/25/07, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>>> How does that compare to 6.2-RELEASE performance?
>>>>
>>> Much better. Fixing filedesc locking was key.
>>>
>>>
>> If there is extra cycles on the same hardware, a performance comparison
>> graph would be great.
>
> See the links in my posting ;)
I think he means graphs between 6-stable and 7-current - it would be
very nice to see those on the same machine, mysql configuration, etc.
(at the very least to clearly show why people should upgrade :) ).
Performance is a pretty weak reason to upgrade, unless of course you
have a performance problem. The one thing that will really push me to
upgrade is bug fixes to stuff that I use where the risk of exposure to
the bug outweighs the risk and cost of upgrade.
Andrew
P.S. I know this is kinda trollish, but I don't understand the
interest in MySQL as a load, particularly when there are more
interesting loads such as PostgreSQL out there. Would you guys mind
graphing the relative performance of PostgreSQL on 6.2-RELEASE and
your patched version please?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
