Andriy Gapon wrote:
I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license acceptance.
You will probably find this is for legal reasons.
If we don't have such a flag, maybe we should add one. One use, for instance, is to skip such ports for portupgrade --batch.
Doing this could make fBSD liable which we certainly don't want. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
