Andrew D wrote: > Andriy Gapon wrote: > > I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports > > that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity > > options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license > > acceptance. > > > > You will probably find this is for legal reasons. > > > If we don't have such a flag, maybe we should add one. > > > > One use, for instance, is to skip such ports for portupgrade --batch. > > > > Doing this could make fBSD liable which we certainly don't want.
FUD, IMO :-) Err to save anyone asking: Fear Uncertainty & Doubt In My Opinion. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey: BSDUnixLinux C Prog Admin SysEng Consult Munich www.berklix.com Mail plain ASCII text. HTML & Base64 text are spam. www.asciiribbon.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
