on 24/11/2008 14:13 Andrew D said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports >> that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity >> options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license >> acceptance. >> > > You will probably find this is for legal reasons. > >> If we don't have such a flag, maybe we should add one. >> >> One use, for instance, is to skip such ports for portupgrade --batch. >> > > Doing this could make fBSD liable which we certainly don't want. >
I think that you did misunderstand what I asked and suggested. I am speaking about skipping the ports not the prompts. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
