On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:47:13PM +0000, RW wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:55:55 +0200 > Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports > > that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity > > options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license > > acceptance. > > > > If we don't have such a flag, maybe we should add one. > > > > One use, for instance, is to skip such ports for portupgrade --batch. > > From man ports: > > INTERACTIVE If defined, only operate on a port if it requires > interaction. > > BATCH If defined, only operate on a port if it can be > installed 100% automatically.
That's from the building user's point of view. The easiest way to handle this in the port itself is to set IS_INTERACTIVE=yes in the port's Makefile, as documented in bsd.port.mk. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If wishes were fishes, the antecedent of this conditional would be true.
pgpSo2cWoVW39.pgp
Description: PGP signature
