Can we just stop arguing about this and bump the frickin' numbers already?
Time is running out!
- jordan
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:21:02AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > Maybe I'm crazy, but can't we find and kill the API change that caused
> > this and back it out for 4.x? I suspect it was the per interface stat
> > changes in the network code, but I could very well be wrong.
>
> We should not, the API change was one allowed by the way we bump shared
> version numbers. Rather than deal with this single case, we should
> consider the issue in the large.
>
> > These sorts of things aren't supposed to impact libc at all. Do we
> > know which one caused the problem?
>
> Sure they are. We can add syscalls,etc al. utill the cows come home and
> not bump the version number.
>
> --
> -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
