On 25.02.2013 11:50, Michael T. Pope wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:34:42 PM Michael Vehrs wrote:
>
> > Well, I have implemented most of that now. Of course, it turns out there
>
> > is yet another problem which I did not see immediately, namely the
>
> > "unattended production" of work places such as the town hall and the 
> church.
>
> Those ones are quite different to the normal production, so perhaps 
> they should be specified independently?
>
> <production>
>
> <output goods-type="bells" amount="3"/>
>
> <output goods-type="bells" amount="1" autoProduced="true"/>
>
> </production>
>
> ... and such elements would be ignored for scaling purposes since they 
> are implicit solely on the existence of the building, not on any input 
> or unit.
>
> Very confusing area I fear.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike Pope
>

Yes, isn't it just. Well, I'll think about it some more over the 
weekend. Maybe I will be struck by enlightenment. Or maybe not.


Regards

Michael



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Freecol-developers mailing list
Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers

Reply via email to