On 25.02.2013 11:50, Michael T. Pope wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:34:42 PM Michael Vehrs wrote: > > > Well, I have implemented most of that now. Of course, it turns out there > > > is yet another problem which I did not see immediately, namely the > > > "unattended production" of work places such as the town hall and the > church. > > Those ones are quite different to the normal production, so perhaps > they should be specified independently? > > <production> > > <output goods-type="bells" amount="3"/> > > <output goods-type="bells" amount="1" autoProduced="true"/> > > </production> >
This seems cleaner, but it is not trivial to implement. We have fine-tuned the order in which modifiers are applied to such a degree that adding unattended production before or after the application of other modifiers fails to produce the expected results. > ... and such elements would be ignored for scaling purposes since they > are implicit solely on the existence of the building, not on any input > or unit. > > Very confusing area I fear. > > Cheers, > > Mike Pope > Regards Michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
