Hi, > Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. August 2015 um 00:03 Uhr > Von: "Michael T. Pope" <mp...@computer.org> > > On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:11:55 +0200 > win...@genial.ms wrote: > > That will fix itself as soon as PF#30 is implemented: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/freecol/pending-features-for-freecol/30/ > > I am still hesitant over PF#30, and ideally would like more confirmation. > There are two proposed mechanisms, of which I *much* prefer your > suggestion, which is easy to understand and to implement, while the other > is potentially confusing and needs save format changes. I recommend we > finish other PFs first. >
My impression is, that the OP of PF#30 correctly found that there is _some_ mechanism that allows making use of partial moves, but then imagined some logic inside Col1 which never existed and immediately disproved his own guess by saying sometimes he can do more moves than his complicated, guessed mechanism would allow. I'd take the answer to my guess as confirmation it was correct and would think this is enough to implement it (its simple and more correct than now), but would then let the PF open to gather more information, asking if all corner cases are done right and in same way as in Col1. Anyway, its in the hands of the person choosing to implement something to decide which gets done first, and thats mostly you atm. ;) Regards, wintertime ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
