ravindra patake wrote:

> In one hand we say that our CSIR research outputs have no use because it
> always remain in journals none is applied in reality or commercialized and
> on the other hand if CSIR is allowing to use something that could be
> applied, that could be come in reality then why we r opposing the things?

Umm.. a very bad analogy would be that I (or a large set of I s) invest
in a house you own/have custody of and now you expect me to pay you to
use the facilities of the house - at some point in time I need to have a
return on my initial investment don't I ?



_______________________________________________
Freed mailing list
[email protected]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/freed

Reply via email to