At 01:52 AM 4/25/2004 +0400, Arkady V.Belousovwrote:
Hi!
24-įŠŅ-2004 23:05 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EA> EMM386 RAM= is well enough implemented if you make it an alias to X= if EA> you ask me.
Wrong.
X= will limit the range checked, same as RAM does, but using the converse range. X= is more powerful and flexible than RAM, though. EMS support is a default condition, so that does nothing. RAM is apparently a very old option and mostly obsolete.
I= is a forced inclusion except for X= ranges. RAM is a test for inclusion with forced exclusion outside the range. Test for inclusion is the default condition without an X= or I=. That makes RAM much more similar to X=, and its behavior able to be duplicated by X= settings.
I thought "ram" by itself meant dynamic EMS allocation as opposed to allocating a fixed amount (at least, this is what the docs day), that's how I use "ram" in M$ EMM386.
-uso.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
