At 11:36 PM 4/25/2004 +0400, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: >Hi! > >25-įŠŅ-2004 11:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to >[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >>>>>I thought "ram" by itself meant dynamic EMS allocation as opposed to >>>MD> It's not documented that way on any EMM386 docs I see, including >>>EMM386 may be able to convert additional amounts of XMS memory to EMS/VCPI >>>memory, up to the amount specified by the MEMORY parameter. EMM386 returns >MD> That paragraph is only true starting with EMM386 version 4.45, which is >MD> introduced with MS-DOS 6.0. There is Microsoft documentation on that EMM386 >MD> change, but I'll not re-post the full paragraph. > > This is contradiction: above you say that "it's not documented". :)
No, I did not. I said the Microsoft EMM386 RAM option did not work that way, as far as causing the sharing of EMS and XMS memory. I did not say Microsoft EMM386 version 4.45 itself did not share. MS EMM386 versions prior to 4.45, however, also do not share the pool. Bottom line: the RAM option does not work the way you apparently believe it does, based on Microsoft's own documentation. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg297 _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
