> The question whether Masm or Nasm has a larger "community" or is more > "widely > used" is indeed somewhat interesting, but it's interesting because it's a > common propaganda item which nicely shows that people tend to believe > what > they want to believe.
It's also interesting because JWASM and MASM together are possibly still more "widely used" than NASM. That's the reason I explicitly added that they have less developers now. > I realize that you're a bit annoyed, but why? My reply was initiated > because I > felt that someone must take the burden and defend the other side. Isn't > that > just "fair" :)). Please remember, JWasm is an innocent assembler, it > cannot > defend itself. Lawl. This absolutely made my day! Just keep on defending it. Regards, Christian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel