> The question whether Masm or Nasm has a larger "community" or is more  
> "widely
> used" is indeed somewhat interesting, but it's interesting because it's a
> common propaganda item which nicely shows that people tend to believe  
> what
> they want to believe.

It's also interesting because JWASM and MASM together are possibly still  
more "widely used" than NASM. That's the reason I explicitly added that  
they have less developers now.

> I realize that you're a bit annoyed, but why? My reply was initiated  
> because I
> felt that someone must take the burden and defend the other side. Isn't  
> that
> just "fair" :)). Please remember, JWasm is an innocent assembler, it  
> cannot
> defend itself.

Lawl. This absolutely made my day! Just keep on defending it.

Regards,
Christian

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to