On 9/9/2015 11:45 PM, Antony Gordon wrote: > > Wow, > > This is the most activity I've seen on this list in a while, and it's > a temper tantrum of sorts over whether someone has the right to close > source or open source something they wrote. > Tantrums? Here? *gasp* Never... [/sarcasm]
> Talk about comedy. So how are those bugs looking on the bug list in > FreeDOS? > > Yeah, I probably just got myself booted from this list, but honestly I > think (sans sarcasm) that there are bigger tasks to tackle in FreeDOS > than haggling and harassing someone over closed source versus open source. > Can you even get banned from here? I'm really not sure if that's possible. Using what's been allowed here as a guide, you'd likely have to commit one monumental offense to achieve that. lol > It's really not that important, but I have a simple solution, it's a > grand waste of a cd image, but FreeDOS should ship like MS-DOS and > PC-DOS with just the operating system and let everyone else work out > the other software on their own. > > This will eliminate all this back and forth about open source and > closed source and can you include my program in because...if it's not > a DOS command from 1981 until 1994 (DOS 1.0 - DOS 6.22/7.0) it's not > there and you just have to download and build/install yourself. > > -T > I completely agree. Ship minimal, allow for maximum expansion and don't tie yourself down with bloat. Your users will thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools in one place. SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
