On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 9:43 PM Steve Nickolas <usots...@buric.co> wrote:
> > :O > > If 386^MAX could be released under suitable terms (for example the 4DOS > terms are problematic) then that would be something major to add to > FreeDOS. > As you can see in his existing repositories on GitHub ( https://github.com/sudleyplace ), Bob seems partial to the GPLv3, so I guess that would be acceptable to FreeDOS, right? 🙂 Anyway, I opened an issue in his DPMIONE project on GitHub, with a request for a release of the 386MAX source code: https://github.com/sudleyplace/DPMIONE/issues/3 > Isn't it not only a replacement for EMM386, but also for MEMMAKER? > I have no idea. I never used 386MAX back in the day, but if it came with a MEMMAKER-like utility, perhaps that will be included in the source code, should he decide to release it. Perhaps you can ask him in that GitHub thread. On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 9:43 PM Steve Nickolas <usots...@buric.co> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Aug 2021, Volkert via Freedos-devel wrote: > > > It turns out that writing another EMM386 reimplementation from scratch > > might not be necessary after all. > > > > Do you remember this thread from 2012? I see you participated in it as > well: > > > > > https://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/mailman/freedos-devel/thread/4F2097D2.5060500%40sudleyplace.com/#msg28740668 > > > > In point 4 of his opening post, Bob Smith (sudleyplace on GitHub) > mentioned > > that with enough interest, he would be willing to "release the source > code > > for Qualitas MAX (a.k.a. 386MAX)". > > > > In that same thread in 2012, BretJ mentioned that 386MAX supports the > same > > I/O port trapping API as the one offered by Microsoft EMM386. Also, > 386MAX > > supports GEMMIS. > > > > So this might be the ideal solution for both these problems! :) I'll try > to > > reach out to him to ask him if he would still be willing to release the > > source code. > > :O > > If 386^MAX could be released under suitable terms (for example the 4DOS > terms are problematic) then that would be something major to add to > FreeDOS. > > Isn't it not only a replacement for EMM386, but also for MEMMAKER? > > -uso. > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >
_______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel