Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Two points:
>
> - Please don't reformat the code originating from Bochs; IMO it's
> much more important to keep clean diffs between the FMW and the
> Bochs versions so as to simplify back-and-forth porting of bug
> fixes and the like, than it is to enforce a common style.
>
> - If you want to reformat the FMW code itself, please don't mix up
> format changes with real modifications or new code. Keeping useful
> CVS diffs is very important; while a diff clearly marked as 'reformat
> only' can be completely ignored, a diff that contains two lines of
> crucial semantical change amidst thousands of lines of whitespace-only
> diffs is evil ;-)
>
> [ In fact, there's probably no point for you to send me a patch
> containing only the results of an 'indent' run; I'd suggest we
> agree on a set of indent options and I run it myself on my main
> tree ... ]
Strongly agreed. If anyone's a real style freak, write more code
than every else. Then the majority of the code will be in your
liking.
-Kevin
