Ramon van Handel wrote: > Okay. Though I'd prefer the BOCHS code to be clearer itself ;) > About drivers, I had a look today at the DOSEMU sources, > which also have a pretty complete set of hardware. I don't > know whether there are advantages in using these drivers over > using BOCHS drivers, but it can never hurt to have a look (for > instance, the video code looks a lot better than BOCHS because > direct graphics access in full-screen mode is available). It's a good idea to snarf code from other projects. However I suggest we don't mess with trying to be mega-optimal right now, and use a set of known quantities. After we get something interesting running in the VM, than let's hack away. Though, since there is now plugin support, maybe you can do this anyway and keep it modular. Just as long as we can test with a known set of devices and BIOS. -Kevin
- PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Jens Nerche
- Next on the FreeMWare agenda Kevin P. Lawton
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ramon van Handel
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Drew Northup
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ramon van Handel
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ulrich Weigand
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Kevin P. Lawton
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ramon van Handel
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ramon van Handel
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Kevin P. Lawton
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ulrich Weigand
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ramon van Handel
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ulrich Weigand
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Jens Nerche
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ulrich Weigand
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Julian Hall
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ramon van Handel
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ramon van Handel
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ulrich Weigand
- Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework Ramon van Handel
