Re: PATCH: IO Emulation Framework

[Ramon van Handel]

Kevin P. Lawton wrote:

> >    [ In fact, there's probably no point for you to send me a patch
> >      containing only the results of an 'indent' run; I'd suggest we
> >      agree on a set of indent options and I run it myself on my main
> >      tree ... ]
>
> Strongly agreed.  If anyone's a real style freak, write more code
> than every else.  Then the majority of the code will be in your
> liking.

I'm not a "real style freak" in the sense that I only like one
coding style and no other; however, it is very botherful for
me to read code in which several styles are mixed up *badly*.
This is certainly disturbing with indentation differences, brace
placing differences, etc --- it takes away my attention from
the code, and that makes new code awkward to study.

So I don't care *which* style is used as long as it's consistant.
And that's exactly what indent is good at...

-- Ramon