On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 04:29:07PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> In a country where running a Freenet node results in death, my advice is
> not to run a Freenet node, and always has been. In fact, they shouldn't
> be running one anyway if they feel they are in serious danger until we
> reach 1.0. If people insist on talking to Freenet then they should run a
> client and connect to a remote node which they trust (this is largely
> similar to what Brandon suggests, but without creating a
> mini-worse-than-gnutella), but even this isn't perfect. Freenet aims to
> make it impossible to determine who produced and who comsumed specific
> pieces of information. It does not aim to make it impossible for people
> to discover that you are running a Freenet node (although it may make it
> difficult). Read the "Introduction to Freenet" section on the homepage if
> you don't believe me.
But with stuff like MediaEnforcer it may be necessary to keep anyone
from knowing that you are running a Freenet node.
--
Travis Bemann
Sendmail is still screwed up on my box.
My email address is really [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
