BC: > Would a shielded node's operator manually select a shield node? How would he > find one? Would shield nodes allow anyone to "hide behind" them, or only > selected other nodes, or what? Would a node 'advertise' that it was willing > to act as a shield node? I think that any node should be default act as a shield node if so requested. There should be a message or a field in a message which indicates that the sending nodes wants to be shielded. This is a sensible place to put things since where the shielding indicator would goes is with the reference to the node in the shield node's datastore. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymit... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anon... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Travis Bemann
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Oper... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anon... Oskar Sandberg
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anon... Sven Neuhaus
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymit... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anon... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - ... Matthew Toseland
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issue... Aaron Voisine
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the ... Oskar Sandberg