Re: [Freenet-dev] Node Operator Anonymity - the issues

[Brandon]

Brandon:
> > Not a "Freenet", perhaps. But you could certainly have a network with
> > Freenet routing which had no public nodes. It's just that no one has a
> > scheme for this that isn't slow in a practical sense. I wouldn't call that
> > provably impossible as much as impractical to implement.

Ian:
> It is easy to implement such a thing in Freenet but it has the
> inherent problem of *zero* path compression and it would rely purely
> on caching for any respectable amount of speed.

You might be able to have some degree of path compression, but nonetheless
it would suck. Anyway, we're talking about a fundamentally different
creature than Freenet.



_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev