> > But it -decreases- their chance of getting identified, in cases where > > the enemy cannot seize the gateway computer. > Why would they not be able to seize the gateway computer? It has to be > the one connected to the public Freenet, and is going to be the first > discovered. MediaEnforcer doesn't seize nodes, for instance. A system which protects against one form of the attack and not another is better than a system which doesn't protect against either form. _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Scott G. Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Stranger... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Stra... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Scott Gregory Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Tal... Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Stra... Timm Murray
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Chris Anderson
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Scott G. Miller
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Strangers Mr . Bad
- Re: [Freenet-dev] Don't Talk To Stranger... Ian Clarke