On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:35:52PM -0500, Chris Anderson wrote:
> 
> Java has the ability to grant permissions like accept and connect without
> program modification.
> 
> See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/guide/security/PolicyFiles.html for
> administrative details.  See
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/java/net/SocketPermission.html for
> socket permissions.
> 
> That said, it would be nice to have a generic freenet permission interface
> to for other things besides cluster/gateway control.  Like maybe node
> bandwidth quotas (per month) and file length quotas.  The number of
> parameter switches is already getting unmanagable (ever here of
> -dsminsz?).
> 
> Also, I think y'all are overdoing the China/dissident thing.  Businesses
> also have a stake in systems that preserve anonymity.  For the amount of
> financial transactions that are happening on the Internet, security of
> this beast should be our number one concern.  Didn't anyone elses credit
> card number get stolen from Egghead?
> 
Different kind of security.  Freenet is perfectly fine from a "Dont let
anyone find out whats going on/being transmitted" sort of stance.  The
argument is over "Dont let anyone find out we're running Freenet" which is
an arguable problem.

PGP signature

Reply via email to