>     B> There are two types of attacks, those in which they seize the
>     B> IP list of the detected node, and those in which they do
>     B> not. MediaEnforcer's attack is of the first type. Nothing
>     B> protects against the second type, so I'm discussing the first
>     B> type.
> 
> B,
> 
> I think you got this backward, didn't you? I don't believe the
> MediaEnforcer attack entails seizing the node machine (and also the
> trusted node list).

Yes indeed. Sorry.



_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to