29-Jan-03 at 12:53, Brad Stockdale ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> But the problem is the fact that the radgroupreply entries will override 
> whatever is in the radreply table... I would have to use '+=' in both 
> radreply and radgroupreply to send these attributes...
> 
> If I use anything other than '+=', then the first Cisco-AVPair will be 
> overwritten by the second Cisco-AVPair... And if I use += in both tables, 
> then I'll have four Cisco-AVPair's... Which will most likely thoroughly 
> confuse my Cisco router...
> 
> That's my delima...
> 

Make a radgroup with exceptions (no attribs) which is returned for these
people, and then create in radreply custom attribs on a per user basis?

-- 
|-Simon White, Internet Services Manager, Certified Check Point CCSA.
|-MTDS  Internet, Security, Anti-Virus, Linux and Hosting Solutions.
|-MTDS  14, rue du 16 novembre, Agdal, Rabat, Morocco.
|-MTDS  tel +212.3.767.4861 - fax +212.3.767.4863

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Reply via email to