> Yes, we should set the timeout to a higher value. In my patch I used 10ms, > because I was not sure about the reason for the 1ms. > > I would suggest using 1000ms, that will not consume CPU time, but is a > fallback in case something totally goes wrong, to avoid that the whole > application is hanging. > > I have just tested with 1000ms and it works fine.
OK, it's 1000 now. Thanks, Jay ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Freerdp-devel mailing list Freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freerdp-devel
