Thanks Bruce,
Are there any other parcellation units that should be excluded? That
seems to be the only white matter PU.
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Morgan,
no thickness should not be used in the cc.
Bruce
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
I would like to make a mask for group analysis that excludes the
unknown parcellation area. Since I would like to apply the same mask
to all subjects (I have already brought them into alignment with
mri_preproc), I was wondering how I can convert the average template
label/?h.aparc.annot to a .mgz files that I could then convert into a
mask. Is there an alternative way to produce such a mask?
As a follow-up question, I was wondering if parcellation areas such
as the corpus callosum should also be excluded from analysis? Are the
thickness estimates made in the corpus callosum parcellation area
interpretable?
Thanks in advance for your time.
Cheers,
-Morgan
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer