Hi Morgan,
you specify the original surface you want to use, but typically we use
the ?h.white.
Bruce
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for your email. We are actually interested in looking at k though and
I was wondering what surfaces you use for the numerator and denominator.
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Morgan,
I think mris_jacobian computes and applies the scale factor for you. The
group average surface area is the average surface area of the individuals
that went into the group, since the average subject has less surface area
than any of the individuals. Doug uses this to compute the proper cluster
sizes, but it shouldn't matter for the jacobian analysis.
cheers,
Bruce
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
Hi there,
I would like to ask some questions about metric distortion.
1. Following the Wisco et al (2007) paper, metric distortion is defined as
Metric Distortion = k * area of a triangle on a registered sphere / area
of triangle on gray/white interface surface
which I believe I can compute using
mris_jacobian $subject/surf/lh.sphere $subject/surf/lh.sphere.reg
$subject/surf/lh.sphere.reg.jacobian
The subject 's ?h.sphere.reg is formed from the registration of the
inflated sphere of the subject with the Desikan et al. (2006) 40 subject
template? From the wiki, I think the command is
mris_register -curv ?h.sphere
$FREESURFER_HOME/average/?h.average.curvature.filled.buckner40.tif
?h.sphere.reg
so the jacobian measure is derived from the parcellation stage (stage3) of
recon-all.
2. I would like to extract the k factor for each subject which is defined
as
k = total surface area of original gray/white interface surface / total
surface area of individual sphere
do I compute this from the total surface area field of
mris_anatomical_stats $subject $hemi orig / mris_anatomical_stats $subject
$hemi sphere
or do I need to use outputs from different surfaces or extract either
value differently? The sphere values look rather uniform and I wanted to
check if I am using the right thing.
3. Finally, I see in the study average make_average_surface.log file:
setting group surface area to be 1142.0 cm^2 (scale=1.29)
and I was wondering what the scale factor represented here.
Thanks in advance for your time.
Cheers,
-Morgan
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
