Hello,

It is working fine for me

regards

Roberto

On Vie, 24 de Abril de 2009, 10:38 am, Kathryn Devaney dijo:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Thanks! The lh.orig.nofix surface follows the white matter perfectly,
> but the lh.orig surface does not.  So I suspect that the topology fixing
> step is creating this problem.
>
> However, when I load lh.defect_labels this area is not marked as a
> defect, nor are there any major defects labeled nearby (see
> http://nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~kdevaney/monkrecon/lh_wm_defect.tif for
> image).  Does this mean that the topology fixing is not editing this area?
>
> If it is the topology fixing, are there parameters of mris_fix_topology,
> mris_euler_number or mris_remove_intersection that I can alter in order
> to fix this problem, without wreaking havoc in other areas?  Or any
> other suggestions would be much appreciated!
>
> Best,
> Katie
>
> Bruce Fischl wrote:
>> Hi Katie,
>>
>> try looking at the lh.orig.nofix and lh.inflated.nofix surfaces to see
>> if you can see the defect.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Bruce
>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Kathryn Devaney wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bruce & surfers,
>>>
>>> That's what I thought initially, but then I did edit the wm.mgz to
>>> remove topological defects, and re-ran the reconstruction from the
>>> 'fill' step, and this problem remains.  I can't find a nearby defect
>>> in the wm.mgz volume to edit, but maybe there is something that isn't
>>> obvious to me.
>>>
>>> I put up coronal, axial, and sagittal views of the problem area &
>>> neighborhood up at:
>>>
>>> http://nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~kdevaney/monkrecon/coronal_wm_defect.tif
>>> http://nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~kdevaney/monkrecon/horizontal_wm_defect.tif
>>> http://nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~kdevaney/monkrecon/sagittal_wm_defect.tif
>>>
>>> Maybe there is a defect around this area which I'm not seeing?
>>> Otherwise, is there something else that I can do?  Also, let me know
>>> if you'd like to check out the data, and I can put it somewhere
>>> accessible.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Katie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bruce Fischl wrote:
>>>> Hi Katie,
>>>>
>>>> looks like an incorrectly fixed topological defect. You need to edit
>>>> the wm.mgz to remove the defect and rerun autorecon2-wm
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Bruce
>>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Kathryn Devaney wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello freesurfers,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am running a reconstruction of a macaque in stabe4, and I am
>>>>> having a
>>>>> problem with the smooth white matter surface not following the wm
>>>>> boundary
>>>>> in the wm.mgz volume (please see attached for examples in the wm
>>>>> and T1
>>>>> volumes).
>>>>>
>>>>> The non-wm area included in the surface was never part of the wm
>>>>> volume,
>>>>> but I edited the other defects in wm.mgz and re-ran fill, tessellate,
>>>>> smooth1, inflate1, qsphere, fix, finalsurfs, smooth2, amd inflate2.
>>>>> Unsurprisingly, this problem persisted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anything that I can do to fix this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Katie
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>


-- 
Roberto Roiz Santiáñez
Laboratorio de Neuroimagen en Psiquiatría
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, España
Tel: +34 942202520 Ext: 73958
rr...@humv.es
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to