It is the maximum vertex-wise -log10(p) found in the cluster. Why do you think otherwise? You should be able to load the sig map into tksurfer and go to that vertex to find out.

doug

Judith Segall wrote:
Thanks, for you responses Doug and Pratap. But, both of your responses need more clarification, because I believe that we are not all referring to the same 'max'.

Doug:

I understand that when I display the sig.cluster.mgh that the a CWP value of 0.0001 would be displayed as a 4 by the color bar in tksurfer, since it is the -log10(p). However, in this case, which is about the cluster growing summary, the -log10(p) of the CWP does not equal the Max. Max is -3.312 and the CWP is 0.08250. Or an additional example form another sig.cluster.summary, where the Max is -4.310 and the CWP is 0.0192. ClusterNo Max VtxMax Size(mm^2) TalX TalY TalZ CWP CWPLow CWPHi NVtxs Annot 1 -4.310 40526 376.78 -12.0 -66.1 5.4 0.01920 0.01750 0.02100 706 lingual

In Pratap's email his answer to my question of what is the max in the CWP is, "Yes thickness. The MAX indicates the maximum -log10(pvalue) in that cluster." Which, is stating that it is both the thickness and the pvalue. I really think that it is thickness measure, but need some clarification from mgh.

So, is the Max in column 2 of the cluster growing summary report, from monte carlo simulations, thickness?

Thanks,

Judith S.

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:

    It will be whatever you used as input. In this case, it is the
    -log10(p) value of the maximum in the cluster (not the thickness
    value).

    doug


    Pratap Kunwar wrote:

        Hi Judith,

        Yes thickness. The MAX indicates the maximum -log10(pvalue) in
        that cluster.

            Hi all. After looking over our monte-carlo results, I a
            simple question
            about the sig.cluster.summary output.

            Is the " Max" in column 2 below a measurement of thickness?
            thickness, is the correct interpretation the following:
            the most
            significant
            cluster is in the laterorbitofrontal region.
        yes at lateral orbital frontal.
        The max vertex in that
            cluster
            has an average thickness of 3.312 mm and the negative
            directionality
            indicates that it is thinner in that region than in the
            fsaverage (from
            freesufer) used in the group analysis/simulations?
        yes you are correct.
            If it does not refer to thickness, is it a statistic, etc?

            # Minimum Threshold 2
            # Maximum Threshold infinity
            # Threshold Sign    abs
            # AdjustThreshWhenOneTail 1
            # Area Threshold    0 mm^2
            # CSD thresh  2.000000
            # CSD nreps    10000
            # CSD simtype  mc-z
            # CSD contrast lh-Avg-thickness-CAQ-CCI
            # CSD confint  90.000000
            # Overall max 2.05497 at vertex 92846
            # Overall min -3.3122 at vertex 60632
            # NClusters          11
            # Total Cortical Surface Area 65416.6 (mm^2)
            # FixMNI = 1
            #
            # ClusterNo  Max   VtxMax   Size(mm^2)  TalX   TalY   TalZ
               CWP
            CWPLow    CWPHi   NVtxs   Annot
              1       -3.312   60632    278.00    -15.2   47.7  -15.4
             0.08250
            0.07900  0.08600   341  lateralorbitofrontal
              2       -3.231   51202    118.54    -39.5   24.9   16.9
             0.53620
            0.52980  0.54260   212  rostralmiddlefrontal
              3       -3.229   67407    163.06    -19.2   12.0   46.9
             0.36360
            0.35740  0.36980   337  superiorfrontal
              4       -2.463  117667     37.51    -47.8  -50.8    8.0
             0.63240
            0.62620  0.63860    79  bankssts
              5       -2.379  151243     12.92    -30.9  -42.8   36.6
             0.63240
            0.62620  0.63860    38  superiorparietal

            I am trying to finish writing up my results and just need
            answer to this
            question to continue.

            Thanks,

            Judith S.
            Mind Research Network
            _______________________________________________
            Freesurfer mailing list
            Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
            <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
            https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

        _______________________________________________
        Freesurfer mailing list
        Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
        <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
        https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



-- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
    MGH-NMR Center
    gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
    Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422

    In order to help us help you, please follow the steps in:
    surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
    <http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>




--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422

In order to help us help you, please follow the steps in:
surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to