Along the same vein, I found this page on the freesurfer site:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/QATools
but it doesn't seem to link to any actual tools? have these been
discontinued?
-Alex
~)-------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander Li Cohen
al...@npg.wustl.edu (WORK Email)
alexco...@gmail.com (Non-secure / rapid-response Email)
Petersen/Schlaggar Lab
Medical Scientist Training Program
Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the exclusive use of the intended
recipient(s) named herein and may contain information that is
PRIVILEGED and/or
CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified
that any use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this
communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please
destroy all copies of this message and its attachments and notify us
immediately.
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected
Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If
you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized
use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via
telephone or return mail.
On Sep 4, 2009, at 4:03 AM, sima chalavi wrote:
Dear Freesurfer experts,
We performed 6 different (pilot) structural scans from the same
subject and analyzed the data using Freesurfer in order to find the
best scan to be used in our real experiment.
We have checked the Freesurfer output visually and there do not seem
to be any problem as described in the trouble shooting manual. So
all 6 scans manage to get through the Freesurfer process just fine.
However, There are a lot of differences between the numerical
results for the different scans. Please find Attached graphs of
(some of ) the results of segmentation and parcellation of these 6
sequences from the statistical outputs.
Now, the problem is how to select the best scan from these results.
Does any body have a standard protocol for assessing images for
analysis or a standard metric, e.g. goodness of fit, from the
software that we can assess without having a gold standard?
Or any other tip is also appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Sima.
--
Sima Chalavi, Ph.D. student
King's College London
Institute of Psychiatry (IoP)
Box P040,
De Crespigny Park
London SE5 8AF.
Tel:+44-2078485702
BCN Neuroimaging Center (NIC)
University Medical Center Groningen
Antonius Deusinglaan 2
P.O. Box 196
9713 AW Groningen
www.neuroimaging-DID.com
<
six_structural_statistics.pdf
>_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
