Hi Sima,
I've run 6 versions of the same scan of the same subject I got some
differences too. Not so big as you found but still some differences

Probably it's the -randomness flag in the recon-all

Check:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg11235.html
<http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg11235.html>
cheers
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pedro Paulo de M. Oliveira Junior
Diretor de Operações
Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom
--- Novo Netfilter 3.2 www.Netfilter.com.br
--- Novo Netfilter Small Business



2009/9/4 sima chalavi <sima.chal...@gmail.com>

>
>  Dear Freesurfer experts,
>
> We performed 6 different (pilot) structural scans from the same subject
> and analyzed the data using Freesurfer in order to find the best  scan to
> be used in our real experiment.
>
> We have checked the Freesurfer output visually and there do not seem to be
> any problem as described in the trouble shooting manual. So all 6 scans
> manage to get through the Freesurfer process just fine.
>
>
> However, There are a lot of differences between the numerical results for
> the different scans. Please find Attached graphs of (some of ) the results
> of segmentation and parcellation of these 6 sequences from the statistical
> outputs.
>  Now, the problem is how to select the best scan from these results.
>
>  Does any body have a standard protocol for assessing images for analysis
> or a standard metric, e.g. goodness of fit, from the software that we can
> assess without having a gold standard?
>
> Or any other tip is also appreciated.
>
>  Thanks in advance,
>
>  Sima.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sima Chalavi, Ph.D. student
>
> King's College London
> Institute of Psychiatry (IoP)
> Box P040,
> De Crespigny Park
> London SE5 8AF.
> Tel:+44-2078485702
>
>
> BCN Neuroimaging Center (NIC)
> University Medical Center Groningen
> Antonius Deusinglaan 2
> P.O. Box 196
> 9713 AW Groningen
> www.neuroimaging-DID.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to