Hi, Bruce: Why should not be corrected for thickness? Or you mean the cortical thickness should be corrected using mean thickness but not intracranial volume? Can you explain more?
Thank you for your advise. 2010/1/23 Bruce Fischl <[email protected]>: > Hi LJ, > > yes, the volume of the amygdala is in the stats/aseg.stats file for each > subject. There should also be an estimated intracranial volume and brain > size that you can use to account for either one (which represent somewhat > different hypotheses). In general I think the consensus is that volumes > should be corrected, but not thickness. > > cheers > Bruce > > > On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, liyari5018 wrote: > >> Hi all, >> When I completed the recommended recon-all step, I want to get the volume(or >> size) of amygdala for ecah individual subject and to do correlation >> analysis with psychological scale, how can I do this ??? For a group level >> analysis , should i do some head size correction befor ??? >> >> Thanks for your reply!!! >> L J > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > -- Best regards -- 杜政昊 Cheng-Hao Tu, PhD Student Laboratory of Integrated Brain Research Department of Medical Research and Education Taipei Veterans General Hospital No.201, Sect.2, Shih-Pai Rd. Taipei Taiwan Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Tel: +886-2-28712121 ext 3474 Fax: +886-2-28745182 _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [email protected] https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
