Hi Louis, thank you very much for your reply. The problem with our data is that wm is too dark sometimes to use control points (intensity is too inhomogenious in some parts). That's why we would like to have the opportunity to just draw the wm where needed. But for some reason it doesn't correct the surfaces.
Best wishes, Tanja. On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Louis Nicholas Vinke <vi...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi Tanja, > I would recommend you try using some control points. Place one or two just > inside the wm surface near that wm finger which is not being included, and > then possibly one or two control points carefully placed along the wm finger > on voxels with the highest intensity (in the middle it looks like). Not > sure what the other coronal slices look like, but you may want to do > something similar on other slices. > -Louis > > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012, Tetiana Dadakova wrote: > >> Dear FS list, >> >> After recon-all -all we had some wm missing in temporal part of the >> brain (fig. wm_missing1). We edited wm.mgz and re-run recon-all >> -autorecon2 -autorecon3. After this, the wm.mgz looks as fig. >> wm_missing2, but the surfaces still look as fig. wm_missing1. >> What can be the reason that wm.mgz edits didn't affect the surfaces? >> >> Thank you, >> Tanja. >> > > > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the > e-mail > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance > HelpLine at > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in > error > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and > properly > dispose of the e-mail. > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
