Hi, just wanted to bump this up since it looks like Doug is back. On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Michael Waskom <mwas...@stanford.edu>wrote:
> Hi, > > I'm using mri_label2label to reverse normalize labels from fsaverage > space to the native surface. > > I'm ending up with some splotchy-looking labels, for lack of a better > word. See what I mean here: > http://web.mit.edu/mwaskom/www/splotchy.png > > I'm doing this normalization in a script with the following relevant > line, which seems to be what happens inthe BAlabes step of recon-all > > mri_label2label --srclabel ../fsaverage/label/${hemi}.${roi}.label \ > --srcsubject fsaverage --trgsubject ${subj} \ > --trglabel label/$hemi.${roi}.label \ > --regmethod surface --hemi $hemi > > Any idea how I can avoid this splotchiness or, failing that, do a > closing on the label to clean up some of the noise? > > Cheers, > Michael >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
