Hi Doug,
many thanks for your answer, I try to detail it more:

1.- bbregister is registering two Colin27 brains. First one is a 2mm found
in spm/canonical/single_subject_T1.nii, and second one is the
FS_spm_Canonical found in SurfRend distribution. It was in .COR format and
I run recon-all to have a modern version of it. As they are almost the same
brain the registration matrix is quite simple and the registration was
perfect. This way I had exactly the same ROI-s for Colin27 in SPM and in FS
(it did not work that well for fsaverage, that's why I took this approach).

2.- In any case, I have several ROI-s in Colin27 space in FS, and then when
I try to obtain average CT values from my subjects I use these 2 different
approaches: label2label and surf2surf.
mri_anatomical_stats is run on the labels created by mri_label2label.


If you think it will be of help I can send the detailed command line calls,
thanks!
Gari











On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> wrote:

> Hi Gari, I'll need more information. I can't tell what you are doing.
> Eg, what is being registered with BBR? what is mris_anatomical_stats run
> on? Where does Colin27 come into it and why?
> doug
>
> On 09/19/2012 06:15 PM, Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga (Gari) wrote:
> > Dear Freesurfers,
> > We've been comparing 2 different methods to obtain CT averages for 4
> Volume ROI-s (volume ROI-s were in Colin27 space).
> > We've used the 40 buckner subjects for the comparisons.
> >
> > METHOD L2L:            bbregister>>  mri_vol2surf (mgh)>>  mri_binarize
> (mgh)>>  mri_cor2label (label)>>  mri_label2label>>  mris_anatomical_stats
> > METHOD S2S:           bbregister>>  mri_vol2surf>>  mri_preproc
> (mri_surf2surf)>>  mri_segstats
> >
> >
> > After performing t-test-s over the results, we can observe that the
> results are in many cases different.
> >
> > -- Is there a way to choose the "best" method? Which one should we use
> for our work and why?
> >
> > Many thanks again for your help,
> > Gari
> >
> > PD We've tabulated a third method as well:
> > METHOD SurfRend: Surfrend (.w)>>  mri_surf2surf(.mgh)>>
>  mri_binarize(.mgh)>>  mri_cor2label (.label)>>  mris_anatomical_stats
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
>
> --
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
> Fax: 617-726-7422
>
> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to