Hi Doug,
thanks for your input. I turns out that there is some problem when
converting minc to NIFTI with float. I got a hold of the original minc file
and converted it to NIFTI with minc2nii using integer, and now the values
are in a reasonable range and the skull stripping works.
Thanks!
Caspar



2013/12/30 Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

>
> That should not be a problem. Certainly it should not cause everything to
> go to 1s and 0s. What version of FS are you using? And you say the same
> thing happens with FSL? Try using mri_convert to convert the nonbinary
> image to another nifti file and see if you get 1s and 0s. If not, then try
> that file as input. You can also try fscalc, something like
>
> fscalc input.nii mul mask.nii -o output.nii
>
> should accomplish the same thing
>
> doug
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/30/13 1:12 PM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
>
>  Hi Doug,
> that's correct.
>  I think the problem is perhaps that the original NIFTI file has a very
> narrow range of values, between 43.7308 and 43.8476, to cover the whole
> range of tissues in the image.
> It is an average over several subjects, and before skull stripping, there
> are hardly any zeros in the image.
> Is there a way to rescale the file?
>  Thanks, Caspar
>
>
>
>
> 2013/12/30 Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>
>>  And macaque_25_model-MNI.nii is the non-binary image? And
>> macaque_stripped_mask.nii.gz is the binary mask? If so, the command looks
>> right to me.
>> doug
>>
>>
>> On 12/30/13 12:08 PM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Doug,
>> this is the command line input:
>> mri_mask macaque_25_model-MNI.nii macaque_stripped_mask.nii.gz
>> macaque_stripped_final2.nii
>> this is the terminal output:
>> DoAbs = 0
>> Found 14652800 voxels in mask
>> Writing masked volume to macaque_stripped_final2.nii...done.
>>  The same thing happens when I use nii.gz or mgz files.
>>
>>  Caspar
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/12/30 Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>
>>>
>>> what is your command line and terminal output?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/30/13 10:22 AM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
>>>
>>>    Hi Freesurfer Experts,
>>>  I am trying to apply a mask that I made with FSL's bet to a NIFTI file
>>> that I got from someone else.
>>>  The mask looks fine, the NIFTI file is in float format, does not
>>> contain NaNs or negative values, but the overall values are all pretty low
>>> (in the 40ies). When I try to apply the mask to the NIFTI file using
>>> mri_mask, the output I get is essentially a copy of the mask (only zeros
>>> and ones). The same happens if I use fslmaths.
>>>  Any advice would be very much appreciated.
>>>  Thanks, Caspar
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing 
>>> listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
>>> it is
>>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>>> e-mail
>>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>>> HelpLine at
>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>>> in error
>>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>>> properly
>>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to