Hi Lee, I’m replying to the list on this, in case anyone else echoes this trouble when altering surfaces. In addition to the email help, I also checked the thread noted, which specified that the recon-all.log file would have the line information. I followed the mri folder commands you offered, both as more recent, as well as the fact that the recon-all.log file listed a mean, not a solid min/max number.
I’ve been trying to play around with the command options you gave me, so that the other two brains that had this problem at the initial reconstruction can also be adjusted, and I know what I’m doing. When I ran this command: mri_segment -wlo 105 brain.mgz 105_o01.mgz it produced a file, but I can’t tell how the normalization intensity is from the file set up, and I ended up with no segment lines. Hence the second command line, I’m sure… However, some of this makes sense to me on this, and some doesn’t. There’s a segment.dat file in the MRI folder, and thus it runs the adjustment command on the brain.mgz file. There is no make_surfaces.dat file. I figured I’d run the command for the fun of it: mris_make_surfaces -wlo 105 brain.mgz 105_o01.mgz – using brain.mgz because of the instructions you’d given me to run the commands from the mri folder, and assuming the logic that both commands were altering the brain.mgz file. and got told there was no brain.mgz subject in my directory: /home/jlk130230/anatomical/brain.mgz/mri/filled.mgz was the volume that couldn’t be opened. So, I moved back out to my subject directory for this, based on both the error and the wiki information on the command, using: mris_make_surfaces -wlo 105 fmri35_o01 r l 105_o01.mgz based on the wiki information to use the subject, then input information on hemispheres, and the volume to be altered. This time, I thought maybe that it needed to alter the 105_o01 file I’d created with the segment command, since that was the dat file that was located in the folder. However, first – unlike the instructions on the wiki stated, the hemisphere information was not recognized, it was seen as a file name: /home/jlk130230/anatomical/fmri35_o01/surf/r.orig: could not open file No such file or directory So, I got rid of the hemisphere information, and ran it without that – mris_make_surfaces -wlo 105 fmri35_o01 105_o01.mgz This time, I realized there is no surf folder that is recognized based on the file name - /home/jlk130230/anatomical/fmri35_o01/surf/105_o01.mgz.orig does not exist. The surf file is outside of the mri folder, and also contains no dat file with the mris_make_surfaces command, and the mri folder has a brainfinalsurfs.mgz file – but, it doesn’t seem like this would help edit the new volume either, nor is it specifically "surf." While searching the wiki on expert opts, I found Bruce’s notice on some commands being designed to be sure that experts were using them – which I’m sure I’m not – but, do you think you can point me in the right direction on this!!!! Thanks very much! Jennifer Kriegel -----Original Message----- From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Lee Tirrell Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 4:06 PM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] surface lines in manual edits After taking a look through some of these subjects, it appears there is low contrast between white and gray matter. The gray matter has higher intensity than what is normally expected by Freesurfer. Re-running the subjects with expert options that raise the lower intensity threshold for white matter greatly improves the result (although further edits to wm.mgz may also be necessary). The command would be: recon-all -autorecon2-wm -autorecon3 -expert /path/to/expert.opts -s subject_name The expert.opts files contains these two lines: mri_segment -wlo 105 mris_make_surfaces -wlo 105 If you want to play around with how these expert options are working, you can run the command below from your subject's mri directory (it is quick). This is the command that makes the first guess at wm.mgz. By default, wlo is 90, but since the gm is so bright, it needs to be raised so that only voxels with intensity >105 are considered wm. I tried a few different values and looked at the output_file.mgz in freeview before settling on 105 for your subject. mri_segment -wlo <num> brain.mgz <output_file.mgz> A previous thread with the subject "how to shrink wm surface" gives some further detail from Bruce and others. http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg37990.html Best, Lee On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi Jennifer > > sorry for the lack of response - do you want to upload your subject > data (the entire subject directory) and we will take a look? > > cheers > Bruce > > > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Kriegel, Jennifer Lynn Sarai wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I apologize for asking this question again, but I’m still not >> receiving any answers on what things I might try. I’ve only been >> using Freesurfer about 3 months, and have basically been working on >> the same analysis project, so I’m pretty new to the tool. >> >> >> >> Again, I have brain surfaces where the white matter surface gets >> confused with the brain surface after control point corrections, and >> after a suggestion from another question asker, I deleted control >> points with zeroes from the control dat files and reran subject >> reconstructions, to get the same results. >> >> >> >> What possible trouble-shooting method could I do on this? Should I >> start the reconstruction edits over completely (several hours per >> brain) using only white matter edits for the white matter surface >> instead of control points? >> Does anyone have any suggestions at all? >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> Jennifer Kriegel >> >> >> >> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> [mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Kriegel, >> Jennifer Lynn Sarai >> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 7:08 AM >> To: Freesurfer support list >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] surface lines in manual edits >> >> >> >> Hi Freesurfer experts, >> >> >> >> I asked this question yesterday. I ended up seeing that a similar >> question had been asked in July, and spoke to the asker of the >> question, who told me his problem had been zeroes on the control >> point dat file, for several points. >> >> >> >> I have attempted to go back through these, and reran several subjects >> with such zeroes removed, however – the same problem reoccurs with >> the white matter surface being seen as the brain surface. Any help would be >> welcomed. >> >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> >> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> [mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Kriegel, >> Jennifer Lynn Sarai >> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 10:44 AM >> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> Subject: [Freesurfer] surface lines in manual edits >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I’m hand editing brains to get the most accurate cortical thickness >> analysis possible, and ran into a bit of a problem with surface >> lines. One issue is with the original structural reconstructions from >> the hdr files, and the other deals with the manual edits I’ve made >> when the recon was re-run. >> >> >> >> 1. A couple of the volumes initially had the white matter >> surface as the pial surface/cortical surface. Initially I tried >> running g-cut for some of the suggestions I found on the wiki when >> the surface lines are off. This didn’t work on those problem volumes. >> >> 2. When editing with control points in order to get the white >> matter areas that were not incorporated into the white matter surface >> included, the control points have overcoverected and made the same >> issue that was the occurrence with the two or three original volumes >> – the white matter surface is seen as the brain/pial surface. I was >> conservative with these as well. >> >> >> >> I have been looking on the wiki for a way to adjust the actual >> surface lines manually based on the actual white matter/brain >> surface. I think this would be most useful, but I’m not sure if it is >> possible. If so, how could this be done – and, if not, what possible >> way of trouble shooting can help deal with this white matter as pial >> surface issue? >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> >> - Jennifer Lynn Sarai Kriegel >> >> MS in Psychological Sciences, Cognition and Neuroscience Emphasis >> >> Functional Neuroimaging of Memory Lab, Center for Vital Longevity >> >> The University of Texas at Dallas >> >> jlk130...@utdallas.edu >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> I am looking for a lot of men who have an infinite capacity to not >> know what can't be done. >> >> - Henry Ford >> >> >> >> The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own >> reason for existing. >> >> - Albert Einstein >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
