Johnathan, can you point us to source of the issues you are concerned about? Is there a paper or website? thanks doug
On 6/8/16 9:46 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > Hi Jonathan > > as far as we know, FreeSurfer is the most reliable and robust > longitudinal brain morphometry tool that is publicly available. We are > working to improve it (always!), but the answer to your question is yes, > certainly 5.3 and the upcoming 6.0 are both excellent longitudinal tools > Bruce > > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Greenberg, Jonathan wrote: > >> Hello Are the volume and thickness measures in FreeSurfer's aseg.stats and >> aparc.stats accurate and reliable enough to assess changes in volume and >> thickness longitudinally? I have heard there have been some >> accuracy/reliability issues in these files in older versions of FreeSurfer. >> Is the data in these files strong enough to base a publication on? >> Thanks! >> Jonathan >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [email protected] https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
