Dear experts,

I noticed that my original mail did not appear in mail archive, therefore I am 
reposting, to prevent this request left unattended. The reason of omitting the 
original post from mail archive was probably the attachments (screenshots). 
Therefore this time I am reposting without attachments. They are included in 
the original mail.

Best regards and merry Christmas,

Antonin Skoch



 From:   Antonin Skoch <a...@ikem.cz> 
 To:   <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
 Sent:   12/21/2016 1:41 AM 
 Subject:   pial surface errors - V6beta 

Dear experts,

in my data I quite often encounter errors in pial surface which is probably 
induced by errors of white surface, in some cases caused by juxtacortical 
lesions (even in healthy subjects). See screenshots for examples. I have tested 
this on freesurfer V6 beta but it is commonly also found in older versions.

I have uploaded the subject pial_errors.tar.gz to your server.

The error showed pial_error1.png in  probably caused by small error in white 
surface shape in 18,-18,63 (RAS). 

Another similar problem is in 15,10,53 (RAS). This is probably caused by 
juxtacortical lesion. 

Another problematic spot with juxtacortical lesion is on -7,18,47 (RAS).

I have observed such kind of errors in quite a large number of subjects, these 
are either healthy controls or subjects with psychiatric ilnesses, therefore no 
particular apparent macroscopic pathology should be present in these subjects.

Do you think that there could be some improvement in the mris_make_surfaces 
code to prevent this kind of behaviour (i.e. very small error in white has 
gross effect on pial), or it is necessary in all these cases to manually 
intervene ? Especially, I do not see any particular problem in image in case of 
pial_error1.png.

And, in case of editing of problems errors by juxtacortical lesions I find 
fastest way to edit wm (due to the fact that I can constrain the brush not to 
draw to existing wm) in contrast to editing aseg (i.e. label the spot as a 
lesion). Do you think that aseg editing in contrast to wm editing has some 
benefit in this case?

Regards,

Antonin Skoch
 
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to