External Email - Use Caution        

Here is my recon-all command line:

recon-all -i ana_Vol.nii -s bert -all

Many thanks.

Best,
An


Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> 于2019年11月18日周一 下午2:33写道:

> What was your original recon-all command?
>
> On 11/18/19 1:48 PM, An wrote:
> >
> >         External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > I want to map the intensities of the volumes on its corresponding
> > surface in order to get the functional values on each vertex in each
> > frame. I ran recon-all for the anatomical volume and saved all
> > outputs(mri,labels,surf and etc.) in the bert folder. I use it because
> > I need to specify the required flag -s in bbregister in order to
> > register the functional volume to its anatomical volume.
> >
> > Many thanks.
> >
> > Best,
> > An
> >
> > Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> > <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>> 于2019年11月18日周一 下午1:31写道:
> >
> >     I don't understand what you are trying to do. I'm very confused by
> >     your
> >     mentioning of bert. What does bert have to do with any of your data?
> >
> >     On 11/14/19 10:47 AM, An wrote:
> >     >
> >     >         External Email - Use Caution
> >     >
> >     > Oops sorry for the mistakenly reply. I will pay more attention
> >     in the
> >     > future.
> >     >
> >     > Bert is the folder with the anatomical data. I tried the following
> >     > steps with the 4D volume but failed. Then I checked the
> >     registration
> >     > result after bbregister and found that the volume was not
> >     registered.
> >     > After that I tried another 4D volume to do the steps and
> >     successfully
> >     > got the sampled intensity onto the surface.
> >     >
> >     > The difference between the new 4D volume I used and the previous
> >     one
> >     > is that there are two transformation matrices between them. The 4D
> >     > dataset that I previously used but failed is the volume already
> >     > registered to its anatomical volume(by using others tools). The
> >     new 4D
> >     > volume that I tried and succeed is the volume not registered.
> >     >
> >     > I have no idea why the 4D volume after the transformation would
> >     cause
> >     > a failed result. Could you please let me know that?
> >     >
> >     > Many thanks.
> >     >
> >     > Best,
> >     > An
> >     >
> >     > Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     > <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>>>
> >     于2019年11月13日周三 下午12:20写道:
> >     >
> >     >     If you have an anatomical MR that you have run through
> >     recon-all,
> >     >     then
> >     >     just use that one instead of bert in your steps below
> >     >     ps. Please remember to post to the FS list and not to us
> >     personally
> >     >
> >     >     On 11/12/19 8:41 PM, an wrote:
> >     >     >
> >     >     >         External Email - Use Caution
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Many thanks.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > I got the 4D fMRI dataset from others and it is not raw
> >     data. In
> >     >     order
> >     >     > to run mri_vol2surf, I need to calculate the register.dat
> >     for the
> >     >     > required flag --srcreg so I tried in this way.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > FYI, the 4D fMRI dataset should have been registered with its
> >     >     > anatomical MR volume by using other tools.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > For now I only ran the recon-all on its anatomical MR volume
> >     >     without
> >     >     > running the functional stream as I don't have the raw data.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Should I also run the raw fMRI data from scratch by using
> >     >     functional
> >     >     > stream? Or if I can run mri_vol2surf independently, which
> >     command
> >     >     > should I use to get a register.dat file?
> >     >     > In addition, the intensity of the 4D fMRI dataset I have
> >     is between
> >     >     > [-1, 1] and not integers, would this cause any problem?
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Best,
> >     >     > An
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     > On 11/12/19 10:41 AM, Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. wrote:
> >     >     >> Don't do the 1st step.
> >     >     >> Why are you registering it to bert? I'm pretty sure bert
> >     did not
> >     >     >> participate in your fmri study
> >     >     >> When you run mri_vol2surf, it will probably work better with
> >     >     >> --projfrac 0.5
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> On 11/11/2019 1:32 PM, An wrote:
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>>         External Email - Use Caution
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>> Hi Prof. Greve,
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>> Thanks for your reply and sorry for the confusion.
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>> I have a 4D fMRI dataset with 10 time frames, where the
> >     >     intensity of
> >     >     >>> each voxel is between [-1,1] and not integers. I want to
> >     map the
> >     >     >>> intensities of the volumes on its corresponding surface in
> >     >     order to
> >     >     >>> get the functional values on each vertex in each frame.
> >     I have
> >     >     >>> already run its corresponding anatomical image in
> >     freesurfer.
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>> To achieve it, I tried the following steps:
> >     >     >>> 1. conform the fmri series by using mri_convert
> >     >     >>> 2. register the fmri series with the anatomy image by using
> >     >     >>> bbregister: bbregister --mov /4Dvol.nii/ --s bert --reg
> >     >     register.dat
> >     >     >>> 3. assign values from volumes to each vertex by using
> >     >     mri_vol2surf:
> >     >     >>> mri_vol2surf --src /4Dvol.nii /--out/lhtest.mgz/ --srcreg
> >     >     >>> register.dat --hemi lh
> >     >     >>>     I also tried the -regheader in mri_vol2surf:
> >     mri_vol2surf
> >     >     --src
> >     >     >>> /4Dvol.nii /--out/lhtest.mgz/ --regheader bert --hemi lh
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>> The /4Dvol.nii /aligns very well with the orig.mgz in
> >     >     freeview. But
> >     >     >>> after step2, the registered volume looks wrong. I am
> >     wondering
> >     >     could
> >     >     >>> I use bbregister to register multi-frame fMRI series to
> >     a single
> >     >     >>> volume?
> >     >     >>> I also tried to use --regheader to replace the --srcreg
> >     file in
> >     >     >>> mri_vol2surf as the output register.dat in step2 is
> >     wrong. But
> >     >     the
> >     >     >>> output is still wrong.
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>> Many thanks.
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>> Best,
> >     >     >>> An
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>> Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >     <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> >>
> >     >     >>> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >     <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>>>> 于2019年11月11日周一
> >     下午12:16写道:
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>>     When you say it is 4D, what do you mean? That each
> label
> >     >     has its
> >     >     >>>     own frame?
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>>     On 11/6/19 5:59 PM, 曲岸 wrote:
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     >         External Email - Use Caution
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     > Hi there,
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     > I am working with creating a surface parcellation
> >     from a
> >     >     >>>     volumetric
> >     >     >>>     > parcellation and have some questions as follows:
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     > 1. If the volumetric parcellation is a labeled 4D
> >     >     multi-frame
> >     >     >>>     dataset,
> >     >     >>>     > could I still use the mris_sample_parc? Or could
> >     >     mri_vol2surf
> >     >     >>>     get the
> >     >     >>>     > sampled labels for every vertex?
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     > 2. For the 4D multi-frame dataset and mri_vol2surf
> >     output
> >     >     >>>     results,
> >     >     >>>     > which GUI should I use to visualize it? I tried
> >     freeview
> >     >     for 4D
> >     >     >>>     > multi-frame dataset but it looks weird.
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     > 3. Is there any command to separate multi-frame
> >     volume to
> >     >     >>>     single frame
> >     >     >>>     > volumes?
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     > Many thanks!
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     > Best,
> >     >     >>>     > An
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     >     >>>     > _______________________________________________
> >     >     >>>     > Freesurfer mailing list
> >     >     >>>     > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> >     >     >>>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>
> >     >     >>>     >
> >     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>>  _______________________________________________
> >     >     >>>     Freesurfer mailing list
> >     >     >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> >     >     >>>     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>>
> >     >     >>>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>>
> >     >     >>> _______________________________________________
> >     >     >>> Freesurfer mailing list
> >     >     >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> >     >     >>>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >>
> >     >     >> _______________________________________________
> >     >     >> Freesurfer mailing list
> >     >     >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
> >     >     >>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >     >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
> >     person to
> >     >     whom it is
> >     >     addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
> >     error and
> >     >     the e-mail
> >     >     contains patient information, please contact the Partners
> >     >     Compliance HelpLine at
> >     > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to
> >     >     you in error
> >     >     but does not contain patient information, please contact the
> >     >     sender and properly
> >     >     dispose of the e-mail.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Freesurfer mailing list
> >     > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >     <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Freesurfer mailing list
> >     Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> >     https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to