External Email - Use Caution        

Dear Jim,

I had been looking at the effect of denoising the data to improve processing 
speed in case of noisy data in an ISMRM abstract couple of years ago. However, 
I haven't had the time to follow up on this. Glad to see something similar now 
being implemented in recon-all.

As Doug and Matt pointed out, denoising the input data will bias your results 
potentially which is why it is not recommend to do at all. However, denoising 
the data just for the initialization will reduce defects and errors of the 
initial white matter surface, reducing processing time from many to a few hours 
in case of noisy data. As the actual surface is fitted using the unfiltered 
data this should not impair surface placement.

Best,
Falk


Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Im Auftrag von Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. August 2020 06:04
An: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] use of ANTs Denoising in FS 7.1


        External Email - Use Caution
Thanks for clarifying.

Some initial results on a cohort of 1-2 yo subjects we have run through both 
the infant FS and 7.1.1 pipelines,  seem to benefit from using a denoised T1 
image as input. Specifically, denoising in images with motion generates better 
WM segmentations in complexly folded regions (i.e. occipital/calcarine). We are 
still evaluating.

Jim


Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
________________________________
From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of Douglas N. Greve 
<dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>>
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 10:17:43 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] use of ANTs Denoising in FS 7.1


* External Email - Caution *

brain.mgz is denoised to create antsdn.brain.mgz. This volume is then used to 
create the initial surface. The final surfaces are created from the unfiltered 
brain.mgz but using the orig surface created with the denoised brain.mgz. So 
the denoising helps to create the orig surface which is then used to initialize 
the final surfaces.
On 8/25/2020 5:37 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

I'm looking through the pipeline table , looking to see where the orig surfaces 
are created, which appear to be in autorecon2 /tessellation step . What 
advantage is gained by denoising the image (which image is actually denosed?) 
at this stage if id does not contribute the final surfaces?



Sorry for asking for more detail, just want to make sure I understand the 
application of the utility. Many groups are now denoising their input images 
into many pipelines.



Jim



From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu><mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 On Behalf Of Douglas N. Greve
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 4:05 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] use of ANTs Denoising in FS 7.1



* External Email - Caution *


It is only used to create the orig surface. It is not used in the volume 
segmentation or the final placement of the surfaces. Volume smoothing of any 
kind has the potential to bias the surface placement so we recommend against 
denoising the input.

On 8/25/2020 4:56 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

Hi all,



In previous datasets, and prior to FS 7, we independently ran ANTs denosing on 
the input T1s prior to running recon-all,

However, FS 7.1 now appears to use the  denosing utility in parts of the 
pipeline.



"ANTS denoise is used when creating the orig surface (but not thefinal 
surfaces)"



Does this mean the denoised image is only used in the segmentation part of the 
pipeline (to generated the aseg.mgz) and does not propagate through to final 
surfaces?  Why not use  denoised T1 through the surface-generation phase of the 
pipeline.



Can you provide some further clarification.

Thx.

Jim









________________________________

The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.



_______________________________________________

Freesurfer mailing list

Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer





________________________________

The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.



_______________________________________________

Freesurfer mailing list

Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to