External Email - Use Caution        

I applied the change you suggested. It took me a while to run both
segmentHA_T1 and segmentHA_T2 on all my subjects (n = 145), to see whether
I'll encounter any kind of errors, which I didn't. Thanks a lot!

Bests,
Amir

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 5:35 PM Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. <
jiglesiasgonza...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

> This is most likely a problema with wmparc.mgz which is still at 1mm.
>
> Can you please try these commands from the mri directory of a subject and
> rerunning? The first one renames wmparc to wmparc.1mm and the second
> upscales it to the resolution of the other high resolution volumes using
> aseg.mgz as a references (you could also use any other high res volume like
> norm.mgz, etc).
>
> mv wmparc.mgz wmparc.1mm.mgz
>
> mri_convert wmparc.1mm.mgz wmparc.mgz -rl aseg.mgz -odt float -rt nearest
>
>
>
>
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>
> Senior research fellow
>
> CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
>
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *AmirHussein Abdolalizadeh <amirhussei...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 02:40
> *To: *"Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E." <jiglesiasgonza...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> *Cc: *"freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> *Subject: *Re: segmentHA on Human Connectome Project
>
>
>
> *        External Email - Use Caution        *
>
> Thanks for your reply Eugenio. I renamed a few files in the /mri folder:
>
>
>
> aseg.mgz → aseg.1mm.mgz
>
> aseg.hires.mgz → aseg.mgz
>
> brain.mgz → brain.1mm.mgz
>
> brain.hires.mgz → brain.mgz
>
> filled.mgz → filled.1mm.mgz
>
> filled.hires.mgz → filled.mgz
>
> norm.mgz → norm.1mm.mgz
>
> T1w_hires.masked.norm.mgz → norm.mgz
>
> T1.mgz → T1.1mm.mgz
>
> T1w_hires.norm.mgz → T1.mgz
>
> wm.mgz → wm.1mm.mgz
>
> wm.hires.mgz → wm.mgz
>
>
>
> However, it exits with this error:
>
> Error in segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML (line 822)
>
> MATLAB:sizeDimensionsMustMatch
>
>
>
> It seems there was a file that I did not have to rename or a file that I
> have forgotten to rename, and two files in the process are based on
> different resolutions causing mismatch. Any ideas?
>
>
>
> Bests,
>
> Amir
>
>
>
> p.s. The pipeline works fine with the same subject in which I haven't
> applied any changes to filenames.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 6:43 PM Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. <
> jiglesiasgonza...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> Dear Amir,
>
>    1. By default, FS will use norm.mgz, aseg.mgz, etc. You will have to
>    eg rename norm.mgz to norm.1mm.mgz and copy / symlink / rename the _hires
>    equivalents to get FS to use the highres T1s.
>    2. That sounds appropriate!
>    3. That sounds about right 😉
>
> Cheers,
>
> /Eugenio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>
> Senior research fellow
>
> CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
>
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *AmirHussein Abdolalizadeh <amirhussei...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, October 18, 2020 at 02:48
> *To: *"freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> *Cc: *"Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio" <e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>
> *Subject: *segmentHA on Human Connectome Project
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am trying to run segmentHA pipeline on HCP data. To do so, I have
> downloaded FS processed-extended structural data, manually made "scripts",
> "trash", and "stats" folders in each subject's folder [HCP output does not
> have these folders]. A few notes and questions:
>
>
>
> 1. segmentHA_T1 runs smoothly. However, I do not know which T1 does
> segmentHA use, since there are also a few "_hires" (high resolution) files
> resulting from HCP's structural analysis pipeline (
> https://github.com/Washington-University/HCPpipelines).
>
>
>
> 2. segmentHA_T2 also runs smoothly. However, I didn't know which T2 file
> is the most suitable to be given to this command. I did give
> T2w_hires.nii.gz (Voxelsize = 0.7 mm isotropic) in the /mri folder of each
> subject.
>
>
>
> 3. I statistically checked the correlation between HCP FS generated values
> of whole hippocampus/amygdala, and segmentHA generated ones. Of note, they
> were highly correlated (all p-values < 0.001, all r ~ 0.9).
>
>
>
> I will be glad to know whether the pipeline I used to analyze HCP data is
> correct or any further steps are required.
>
>
>
> Bests,
>
> Amir
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General
> Brigham Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
> to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact
> the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General
> Brigham Compliance HelpLine at
> http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
> to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact
> the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to