It will be the easiest. If you have not edited them, then it is just computer time, right?

On 10/8/2021 2:38 PM, Annalisa Lella wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

        External Email - Use Caution

That's what I wanted to avoid: reprocess all the data. Am I forced to?

Il 8 ott 2021 19:52, Annalisa Lella <annalisale...@hotmail.it> ha scritto:

            External Email - Use Caution

    Pre-processed with recon all

    Il 8 ott 2021 19:50, "Douglas N. Greve" <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
    ha scritto:

        What do you mean by "elaborated"?

        On 10/8/2021 1:29 PM, Annalisa Lella wrote:

                    External Email - Use Caution

                    External Email - Use Caution

            I have elaborated all my data with recon all version 7.0.
            I am doubting whether I should elaborate them again with
            7.2 or I can simply run the normalisation with 7.2 on the
            data preprocessed with 7.0, since you told me that the
            problem with version 7.0 is with the normalisation
            process. I ran few t-test on the volumes and the thickness
            between version 6, 7 and 7.2 and there are few differences
            across all the versions. So actually it doesn't seem that
            the results of recon all with version 7 are bugged.

            Il 8 ott 2021 18:53, "Douglas N. Greve"
            <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
            ha scritto:

                Sorry, I'm not sure what you are asking when you ask
                what you should do. Do about what?

                On 10/4/2021 5:30 AM, Annalisa Lella wrote:

                            External Email - Use Caution

                            External Email - Use Caution

                    Dear Mr. Greve,

                    thanks so much for your reply! I have been running
                    t-tests on cortical and subcortical volumes FDR
                    corrected on 50 subjects to compare versions 6, 7
                    and 7.2 but I didn't see so much differences. What
                    should I do? Should I run again recon all with
                    version 7.2 on all the subjects? Or can I use
                    version 7.2 for my analysis on data pre-processed
                    with version 7?

                    Thanks a lot in advance!

                    Annalisa

                    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    *Da:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
                    <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
                    <mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
                    per conto di Douglas N. Greve
                    <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
                    <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
                    *Inviato:* venerdì 1 ottobre 2021 17:18
                    *A:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
                    <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
                    <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
                    *Oggetto:* Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer version
                    The 7.0.0 release was recalled because the
                    intensity normalization *sometimes* did the wrong
                    thing. It would not surprise me if you were not
                    seeing any of these effects, but I can't guarantee
                    that it won't happen in your data. If it was
                    happening, you would see some big differences in
                    the thickness, and maybe the subcortical volume.
                    If you have edited your data, you can run version
                    7.2 on edited 7.0 data and 7.2 will respect and
                    incorporate your edits.

                    On 9/27/2021 6:37 AM, Annalisa Lella wrote:

                                External Email - Use Caution

                                External Email - Use Caution

                        Hi,

                        I was wondering if you could help me or give me more 
information. I have
                        pre-processed my MRI data using FreeSurfer version 7.0, 
which has been
                        recalled. I used the same version for the thalamic 
segmentation. I have
                        elaborated my data one year ago. Do I have to 
pre-process all my data again? I
                        randomly segmented few subjects with versions 6.0 and 
7.2 and I implemented a
                        visual quality check but it seems to me that the images 
segmented with version
                        7.0 are good. I runned also t-tests between the 
extracted cortical volumes of
                        the three versions and there are overall few 
differences across the versions.
                        Where could I see if my data are not good? Which are 
the effects of the bug in
                        version 7.0?

                        Thanks!

                        Annalisa


                        _______________________________________________
                        Freesurfer mailing list
                        Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
                        
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1akPrdQzffjqy3vX0uUabfKfKkuLHH5OwDbaVZLwBv0TV7DNLFWYYJ9bfR4-vecoSB4czek6-JkCN3LcE7wIqTEO5S6czbbLcKoxgQOR0pcEv2lMDGRZ4zrO-91wji7eppLoW7_va9iWdEmSp3vG8nkzGUTo-_eaYHE8yxxUdLPeir6zl6j6DfG7pF5raD_DmC8VmsONzjrGwnpcPuS4ts9RvwtLSHMbcKhCuYDLjwH9vRuzUjZSZ7aBPb3aIr2fx0SlE866YrwsTDb-ZIbabHQ/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer



                    
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1hh9f1waCfRgOtSLliou6EyCJxnslY1S63XtNnNYjx0etpWM3rl1NncKnTxlFwFlnb4D5t1Ig8PSTtEoBgharwFpkzB2Pan_6tVsiRTYTUhgZekQstSZYU1dL9X9nyZa51NoJ_1If1z2C_O0Nh9BX4s33vMAipAmP6wkElWBivPmrrdXLMoJURpkY-GxO8_NindNP0LUFvO5DKf4V_ncKxq66mL8UT9n5XgXlS0Eeb17EEbOPaMWkg5G05TZPrGzJKKQrr4fYVlT67t97Qvg2Fw/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.avast.com%2Fsig-email%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dlink%26utm_campaign%3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail>
                        Virus-free. *MailScanner has detected a possible
                    fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming
                    to be* www.avast.com
                    
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1hh9f1waCfRgOtSLliou6EyCJxnslY1S63XtNnNYjx0etpWM3rl1NncKnTxlFwFlnb4D5t1Ig8PSTtEoBgharwFpkzB2Pan_6tVsiRTYTUhgZekQstSZYU1dL9X9nyZa51NoJ_1If1z2C_O0Nh9BX4s33vMAipAmP6wkElWBivPmrrdXLMoJURpkY-GxO8_NindNP0LUFvO5DKf4V_ncKxq66mL8UT9n5XgXlS0Eeb17EEbOPaMWkg5G05TZPrGzJKKQrr4fYVlT67t97Qvg2Fw/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.avast.com%2Fsig-email%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dlink%26utm_campaign%3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail>



                    _______________________________________________
                    Freesurfer mailing list
                    Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
                    
https://secure-web.cisco.com/15sAgHUzMEb_AyuIOA2x3LcGAxK_Eh0gwnf8ktaxYxlUrdwgKQFHDEXMmjhs01RFLPsHm0Cs_cQyHqvIvA-M5WJ6cGpsGIMkdkvOATkF0gG7rxgYl562vIcnyv2_kCNBf58XQgzJadqEEmFjMdN7XoIq9PHMgdbpYSUr-D0FLNDAFJmh1s4ViJ6ESNVfUsGeSShIWPMZCol6n5oWhEcvr1m5GUnTKJ1dOH8VSsW_8fTKx6bOU-CYxkE8KGAgvlieBrDoG0OarSBxDLKM138imEQ/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer




            _______________________________________________
            Freesurfer mailing list
            Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
            
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1KGe7t4jIxJV2SyO2vk4bemMOyuvzNx2GvTpMJFOz1UovRj5lGGascg730l2IYDZmxBdZBSMIUj5kqPgJvsWQGNhVbwKXAeqnCTVq6I5r5KiiZz63o8eyrNbhZj5DGcsI4usr8ou8tI6n8jhBMuMsdO0kGUUhhuHocC5IG459KOJgCZO1FYbitrr6EOJX5nh3meGcTS-UkaDSCVUWJPBRSOfaTjv_zrfXBrJtWwbB9GQkh9ft9c-s0dao0my83wezJDIAYhrBWwU-cXw6AMTkfQ/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer





_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1JgInk38hl8_MAQziuYBofdcRXX41PO7Z-_volOhRW8e9GxFTHWhurqd_fcTV9oMhvMS_Uf89aTwvVX9iZDpQNrqSbxnk6WSWASm6SQ-N69rqcdylGTbBpFFfYYPDtmoz2WyAUadQ8PW1hxB4UJwahniDLniu3UgRQEDpxPXam5ac1XDh_bDPtGHwoBg7zFaQvIEMsJ9lRscCxOBbVeceDAh-vpYjPD1mv9luYJOchej_AA6o_bLBoh25XhJ6p6FF/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If 
the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, 
please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to